Skip To Main Content
Lodi Unified School District

Policy 5131.9 - Academic Honesty

Series: 5000 - Students

Policy: 5131.9 - Academic Honesty

Adopted: 06/02/1998

Last Revised: 02/03/2026

Last Reviewed: 002/03/2026

Download Policy 5131.9 - Academic Honesty PDF (English)

Download Rule 5131.9 - Academic Honesty PDF (English)

Academic Honesty

The Board of Education believes that academic honesty and personal integrity are fundamental components of a student’s education and character development.  The Board expects that students will not cheat, lie, plagiarize, or commit other acts of academic dishonesty.
 
Students, parents/guardians, staff, and administrators shall be responsible for creating and maintaining a positive school climate that encourages honesty.  Students found to have committed an act of academic dishonesty shall be subject to district and school-site discipline rules.
 
The Superintendent or designee may establish a committee comprised of students, parents/guardians, staff, administrators, and members of the public to develop standards of academic honesty, measures of preventing dishonesty, and specific consequences for acts of dishonesty.  Any recommendations for discipline shall be incorporated into the school’s site level discipline rules.
 
Prohibited and Permitted Technology Use
As the district’s standards for academic achievement are designed to challenge all students to reach their full potential in acquiring the knowledge and skills needed for success in postsecondary education, employment, and responsible citizenship, any use of technology that prevents or inhibits a student from achieving these standards is prohibited.  Prohibited uses include, but are not limited to, using technology primarily or solely for the completion of coursework as a student’s original work and generating answers to mathematical, scientific, or analytical problems.
 
Permitted uses of technology include, but are not limited to, conducting research, correcting grammar and spelling, and learning from educational applications such as tutoring systems and language learning applications.
 
Additionally, consistent with the limitations expressed in this policy and with teacher consent, students may also use technology to assist with assessments, homework, and/or makeup work or other uses approved by the teacher.
 
However, a student with a disability shall be permitted to use technology for any purpose identified in the student's individualized education program as a tool to support the student’s learning.
 
If an employee suspects that a student has used technology in violation of this policy, the student shall be given the opportunity to demonstrate that the use of technology was in accordance with this policy.
 
Any information acquired from an employee’s use of technology in determining whether a student has committed an act of academic dishonesty shall be shared with the student, and the student’s parent/guardian as appropriate.
 
The Superintendent or designee may provide training to staff regarding the use of technology to improve education, including the detection of plagiarism and sensitivity to potential discrimination from algorithmic bias.

Rule 5131.9

Adopted: 06/02/1998

Last Revised: 08/20/2024

Last Reviewed: 08/20/2024

Cheating
Students are prohibited from engaging in dishonest behavior in all forms of academic work. This includes, but is not limited to, the unauthorized use of digital resources such as the internet and artificial intelligence (AI), copying from others, signaling for information exchange, possessing or distributing unauthorized materials, and any actions that undermine the fairness and integrity of all academic assignments and assessments.

Plagiarism
Students are required to honor the intellectual property of others across all academic endeavors. Plagiarism, defined as the use of another’s ideas, words, or work without appropriate acknowledgment, is strictly forbidden. This policy applies comprehensively to all academic outputs, such as written assignments, projects, presentations, and any other coursework that is submitted for credit.

Falsification
Students must not falsify or alter any academic materials or information to misrepresent their academic achievements. Prohibited acts include, but are not limited to, forging signatures, altering graded work, adding or removing written or electronic responses post-submission, and manipulating grading indicators to deceptively reflect improved performance.

Use of Generative AI

Integrity and Verification in the Use of Generative AI
Students must not replace their original work with that of generative AI in assignments and assessments. They must demonstrate their own understanding and are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information provided by generative AI.

Permitted and Encouraged Uses
Generative AI may be used for research and learning enhancement, subject to explicit teacher approval. It can assist in learning activities, provided students critically engage with and validate the information received.

Prohibitions and Restrictions
The use of generative AI to generate answers for evaluative problems or complete original work assignments is prohibited. Its use is also forbidden in any instance where expressly disallowed by an educator or school site.

Citation and Attribution
All generative AI assistance must be transparently cited, including the name of the tool and a description of its use. Content derived from generative AI must be critically assessed and edited by the student, ensuring its validity before submission.

Role of Generative AI in Education
Generative AI is to be a supplemental aid that enhances but does not replace the learning process, including the development of critical thinking, independent research, and writing skills. It is crucial that generative AI does not compromise the cultivation of these foundational abilities.

Violation of this policy, including unethical use of generative AI tools, will result in disciplinary action. Depending on the severity of the misconduct, repercussions may include academic penalties such as a zero on the assignment, failure of the course, or additional consequences consistent with the district and school discipline policies.

Legal References

Policy Reference Disclaimer:
These references are not intended to be part of the policy itself, nor do they indicate the basis or authority for the Board to enact this policy.  Instead, they are provided as additional resources for those interested in the subject matter of the policy.
 
STATE
EDUCATION CODE
35291-35291.5 Rules
56341.1 Assistive technology devices for a student with a disability
FEDERAL
UNITED STATES CODE
20 USC 1401 Assistive technology device; definition
MANAGEMENT RESOURCES
METROPOLITAN ED. RESEARCH CONSORTIUM PUBLICATION
Balancing the Benefits and Risks of AI Large Language Models in K12 Public Schools, 2023
USDOE OFFICE OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PUBLICATION
Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations, May 2023
WEBSITES
Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium https://merc.soe.vcu.edu/
CSBA District and County Office of Education Legal Services https://legalservices.csba.org/#